 |
Vintage21 Church downtown Raleigh, NC
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rob Davis

Joined: 23 Jan 2008 Posts: 90 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:32 am Post subject: The Life, Death & Resurrection of Jesus |
|
|
Hey people. Just wanted to let you know that I feel pretty overwhelmed with the amount of stuff I could present to you in the third and fourth weeks of the gospel class. That said, I am making a commitment to blog some of the things that I'd like to spend time on in that class, but it just won't be possible to hit it all. I'd love to get some interaction going around the thoughts I'll be posting.
Earlier today I posted some thoughts on the Kingdom of God here:
http://v21missionality.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/the-kingdom-of-god-is-at-hand/ _________________ http://inandfor.wordpress.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ryaneves
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 1 Location: North Raleigh
|
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:56 pm Post subject: Thoughts on last night's topic (4/21/08) |
|
|
So I had some thoughts about this last night but wanted to let them sit before speaking on them.
We talked last night about whether sin came into the world because we chose death over life or whether we chose our will over God's. To me, Adam and Eve (and now we have) chosen our will over God's. The option was always there to either eat of the tree of life or not. Adam and Eve could have chosen between life and death but for one issue: they had no knowledge of life and death because they had not eaten of the tree of knowledge. This only works of course if you look at death as evil and life as good (which I think most of us would agree with).
So, to me, it seems that Eve and then Adam chose their own will over God's and this led to Sin which then led to death.
In my mind (and heart for that matter) God gave us free will because it means so much more to willingly follow something, to choose it above and beyond other things. It's the flip side of the coin we spoke of last night where God created us even though He knew we would fail because it would mean He could pursue us and show us the extent of His perfect love. We both get to feel this pursuit and pursue Him ourselves.
Any and all comments would be welcome. Hopefully that made some sense...
Ryan _________________ Ryan Eves
"Love is the province of the brave" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Davis

Joined: 23 Jan 2008 Posts: 90 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: Re: Thoughts on last night's topic (4/21/08) |
|
|
| ryaneves wrote: | | In my mind (and heart for that matter) God gave us free will because it means so much more to willingly follow something, to choose it above and beyond other things. |
I think this is important, but I don't think it's primary. For instance, I want my children to be free to decide how they are going to believe, how they are going to live their lives, etc. But, at some points, as their loving father, I have to override their will to keep them from harm (not to do so would be unloving). I think we have to maintain a balance.
We have to be careful when using the language of "free will," because in our day it means something different than in the past. Freedom, to us, means autonomy, the "right" to do whatever we want without anyone else intruding upon our freedom. But, biblically speaking, freedom is actually slavery.
John 8:34,36 - Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin... So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed."
Romans 6:22 - Now you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God...
So, we should seek to be "free," but the better freedom is that which is willing slavery to Jesus.
Lesslie Newbigin spoke about this "freedom offered by the serpent in Eden," "the freedom to make one’s own decisions about what is good. By accepting that offer, we put ourselves under the domination of powers that lead to destruction.”
When put in those terms, that's definitely not what we want, but that's what Adam & Eve chose, and we have all continued the legacy.
The idea of human autonomy actually runs up against the truth of God's sovereignty. Basically, if anything other than God is autonomous, then God is not sovereign - and if God is not sovereign, then God is not God. So, any amount of human freedom is, of course, relative.
Somehow, we have to hold on tightly to God's absolute sovereignty and human responsibility. If we diminish either of those, I think we're doing damage to how Scripture describes God and humanity. _________________ http://inandfor.wordpress.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Seanette
Joined: 23 Apr 2008 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:10 pm Post subject: Another question regarding sin. |
|
|
Okay, so I'm trying to wrap my little bitty head around some aspects that have been confusing me during the discussion of sin and Genesis during the Gospel class.
I can't figure out if sin was the plan or if sin was chosen. Rob, you gave an example that when you have kids you're taking a chance because they could possibly betray you. So was God taking a chance? If God was taking a chance, was our (Adam and Eve's) betrayal already woven throughout His plan?
Someone also mentioned that God intended on bringing glory to Himself through brokenness and suffering. If this is true, was our betrayal of Him really plan B or was there only one plan to begin with? Did God really intend for Adam and Eve to stay naked, unashamed, and in perfect communion with God at all times in the garden or was His intent what really occurred? If God is all-knowing and bigger than our three-dimensional selves...even beyond and outside of time, it seems as if it would have all been His plan to begin with. If so, would Adam and Even not have brought enough glory to Him as they were in the garden? Or did suffering and betrayal have to happen in order for God to receive all glory? (Which we fall short of on a daily basis...)
I've always been one to not question things...but as I read through my Bible that I've had since the fourth grade, it is strewn with question marks of my earlier days...some I can certainly make sense of now, others I still have no answer to. I'm tired of being okay with that...so hopefully all the above question marks are well interpreted. Thanks guys... :D
(emoticons!)
Seanette |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Davis

Joined: 23 Jan 2008 Posts: 90 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:09 pm Post subject: Re: Another question regarding sin. |
|
|
| Seanette wrote: | | I've always been one to not question things...but as I read through my Bible that I've had since the fourth grade, it is strewn with question marks of my earlier days...some I can certainly make sense of now, others I still have no answer to. I'm tired of being okay with that...so hopefully all the above question marks are well interpreted. Thanks guys... |
First off, thank you for being willing to ask these hard questions. I think it's really dangerous to blindly live life with no questioning.
That said, though, I will add that part of being human is not having all the answers. I think we can either have an overemphasis or underemphasis on the mystery of God.
Rather than chance I would use the word "risk" (not sure if I did that on Monday...). I do think God was taking a risk by creating humanity and giving humanity a choice. And, I think because of that risk, our love for God is more real than it would otherwise be. But, again, I think there are always "limits" to our freedom. The garden itself was not the entire world, but only one part of it. Adam and Eve weren't entirely free, because they were human and not divine.
"Was there only one plan to begin with?" I think this is one of the ways in which God is using human language to explain something that we can't really fully understand. Somehow the threat of death was very real, but the potential for life was also real. But, not in the sense that God's actions are dependent upon humanity (Acts 17). God works through us and responds to us, but He doesn't need us. And, even beyond the actual threat, we see evidence of God's grace - God withheld His righteous wrath against Adam and Eve, made clothing for them, and allowed them to live (temporarily). This can also be seen as the first instance of God providing a vicarious substitute in the place of humanity - animals had to be killed in order to provide the clothing (Gen. 3:21).
All followers agree that God knows what can be known of the future. From an orthodox standpoint, that means God knows everything about the future. Other groups of people have claimed that God only knows the potential about the future. And, then others believe that God actually determines the future. Obviously, the second one can't be true, because it doesn't make sense of most of the Bible. So, most people fall within the first or third ideas about God's knowledge of the future. I definitely lean toward the third, but there is always a danger in making God the author of sin (which is also incongruent with the Bible). So, somehow, God absolutely knows the future, and in some sense He determines the future, but He cannot be blamed for sin.
The best way I've been able to make sense of all of this is by seeing God as having two "wills." One way of looking at God's will is that which God desires to happen. The other way is that which God determines to happen. We see both at work in the death of Jesus. Obviously, God does not want people to be killed, but God is said to have been the ultimate executor of Jesus. We can only understand God's will like this with Jesus in mind, knowing the extent of what His death means for the world.
Here are a couple of articles about this idea:
http://www.carm.org/uni/allmensaved.htm
http://www.desiringgod.org/resourcelibrary/Articles/ByDate/1995/1580_Are_There_Two_Wills_in_God
Also, Matt Chandler (pastor of The Village, an Acts 29 church in Texas), taught on this idea:
http://www.thevillagechurch.net/resources/AreThereTwoWillsInGod_mp3.mp3
There's a couple of times in the book of Romans where I think Paul is addressing the objection against this way of thinking. If God gets more glory now than before, then why not sin more?
Rom. 3:8 - And why not do evil that good may come?—as some people slanderously charge us with saying. Their condemnation is just.
Rom. 6:1-2 - What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound? By no means! How can we who died to sin still live in it?
I think rather than saying "God gets more glory because of sin" we should say "God gets more glory when sinners are redeemed." If that makes sense... One way leads us to think that we should sin and suffer, but the other motivates us to worship God with our lives because we have been redeemed. _________________ http://inandfor.wordpress.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hao
Joined: 29 Feb 2008 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks Rob. I didn't mean to throw up a confusing idea of Plan A and B in class but I think you clarified it well in your post. I was trying to explain what some think of as the "ideal world" (Plan A) and what has happened (Plan B).
In very few and confusing words, I was just trying to make this point: God loves Himself and I believe created us for the purpose glorifying God and sharing in His complete and utter joy.
I'll try to break this down a little bit. John Piper in The Pleasures of God: Meditations on God's Delight in Being God quotes Henry Scougal in saying that "the worth and excellency of a soul is to be measured by the object of its love." For God to be God, He must love Himself fully or as Piper puts it, God is most satisfied in God. It was complete and He did not need us.
However, He created us to share in His glory by us glorifying God. We got to share in His love for Himself! But we failed horribly at it and still do. Yet the crazy completely mind-blowing thing is that God loved us so much as to create us, watch us blow it, and then redeem us through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. Put it another way: God pursued us, and removed us from our self-given depravity even though He didn't have to or need us. Why? Because He is God and He loves us (Romans 5:8 ).
I believe this is THE PLAN for our creation. To show us the fullness of His glory through Jesus that we might willfully submit ourselves to His love that was ours from the beginning. I would hesitate to use the word "risk" as it can imply that He wasn't in control. I'm in the camp with Rob that God determines the future.
Therefore, we are very much in the Plan now. Which is why He very much deserves everything we've got. This is the primary purpose of teaching this class: to show God's intricate and determined plan throughout the Bible and in our lives today. Let's now respond appropriately. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|